Post by QualityGradation on Jun 18, 2018 3:35:49 GMT
Since the United States is currently overpopulated, one wonders, naturally, why there are some who are proponents of immigration- often vehement- and the conclusion to be drawn is that their motives are not veracious and Impeccable. For reasons which I don't fully understand, notwithstanding this overpopulation condition (perhaps it's due to the good, warm feelings which ought to predominate), there are still a good handful of countries which should be permitted immigration here- it's not likely that there will be any abuse of the permissiveness, on the part of any of these countries; no need to establish quotas, for example... The fact is that immigrations from Honduras should never in our history have been permitted- this is a simple truth, and yet many appear to be stumbling over it! Immigrations from Mexico should best have been stopped in 1947- good, fruitful relations with an excellent people have been significantly damaged by the overpermissiveness and by a particularly criminal element, who covertly have had an interest in bumping off justified, natural United States citizens, in order simply to create more Space for the people of their "tribe"; to claim the U.S.soil as their own turf. For this reason, the drugs they smuggle are often dangerous, and the whole operation generally.
Those who are advocates of free immigration often are people who want to cause harm and degradation. They may be people lower on the socio-economic ladder,who want to cause harm to the lives of those higher up on that ladder; they want to increase their suffering and decrease their quality of living- thus they are malefactors. Another motive is anger or displeasure with the justified, natural citizenry- for example, an official woman, who hasn't been able to experience love/sexual fulfillement, who wants to cause damage to the country- usually she is angry with the men, blaming them- and becomes a proponent of immigrations/diversity. Also, those who are generally displeased with their compatriots, for some reason. Other motives include those who desire a serfdom constituency, people who will do labor they don't want to do, for cheap. I call this semi-slavery- and it is marked for discontinuance, just as slavery was, for the new aeon.
Needless to say, with this looming danger that someone may want to in effect replace you with a foreign immigrant, the justified, natural citizens should be and should have been generally "on their toes" and doing their best in life. Falling into decadence or sloth; unproductivity, etc. is probably why leaders begin to think about immigrations, a basically corrupt method generally of trying to increase their tax revenue and the apparent or ostensible productivity generally.